Friday, July 11, 2014
Mission Tech Planning - The Interviews
I am excited about the attention Missional Technology Planning has been getting! Love it!
I even get to give the presentation here again in Chicago, you should come, everyone is invited:
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/501-tech-club-chicago-lunch-n-learn-tech-planning-smack-down-tickets-12209403655
But if you are one of my new blog readers or just haven't been paying attention, you might be thinking: What is the Missional Technology Planning Steve is writing about?
Well you are in luck! Here are two video interviews I did back at #13NTC with MAP for Nonprofits! So go grab your org's mission statement, the strategic plan and some popcorn and watch these!
NOTE! Please forgive my look of exhaustion and hat head. I think I should have left the cowboy hat on... These interviews were after a string of presentations and I had no idea what I looked like.
And now that you know what Missional Technology Planning is, Are you ready to use it?
Wednesday, March 19, 2014
What I learned at #14NTC (NTEN Nonprofit Tech Conference)

Kudos to the NTEN staff for a great event and for keeping a smile on their faces the whole time! (or close to the whole time)
Weds, March 12
Pre-Conference: How to Succeed in Technology Failure without Really Leading (check out the slides)I was on the panel for this session, but learned a bunch of things before and during the session from the other amazing members of the panel.
- Awesome report from Standish group on project success\failure
- Creating a shared vision of success: • Everyone must have a shared understanding of what success looks like • Without it, you cannot get to a successful outcome • Senior leadership with tech fluency and IT leadership with mission fluency • The entire organization must be involved
- If leadership manages technology like Captain Picard where there is no discussion, it is just "Make it so," your tech staff will stop being creative and innovative.
- If tech staff doesn't take the time to learn the business, programs, mission, etc., they won't be able to help the org's goals.
- Investing in your tech staff is key. Don't spend all of your budget on an outside consultant and leave your staff without any training. I added a quote I heard about investing in staff: "What if I invest in staff and they leave? The real question is: What if you don't invest in staff and they stay?"
- Rose shared how she used the IT Alignment Model I had a role in creating, plus talked about the value of doing an alignment assessment.
- Great conversation between the leadership staff in the room and the IT staff in the room on how to improve communications-collaboration. Leadership should give IT seat at the table, give authority, share mission information, involve tech early, learn to involve tech in problem solving instead of order taking, etc. Techs should stop using geek speak, learn about the business, stop over-complicating policies, involve users in decisions,
- Talked about how to fail without collapsing the whole org. Learn to identify level of acceptable risk, do pilots, control the scope, build in go/no go checkpoints, set realistic expectations, etc.
- Accountability and Authority are key elements to a successful project, consider using a decision making model like RACI.
- Good quotes:
- “Unfettered Quasi-Illuminati Fueled Social Engineering Conducted by Out-of-Touch Foundations Seeking Self-Aggrandizing Strategies.”
- "Obfuscate stuff with Gobbldy Gook"
- "Reviewing old tweets is not the best way to figure what staff knew after they leave"
- "Funders need to leave room for failure to allow for success"
- "IT Alignment doesn't happen because it is too easy for nonprofits to say "We Don't Have the Resources" or "I Don't Understand the Tech""

#NTCBeer!
I learned about the value of taking time to be social, this may seem easy for me, but it often isn't. I find ways to stay busy and avoid social events. It was proven worth while when a couple people from #13ntc approached me and we both immediately remembered a personal connection we had shared the year before.
Thurs, March 13
IGNITE! Plenary
I heard so many people just loved the Ignite Sessions! It was a fantastic way to kick off the conference:

Huge THANKS TO Peter S. Campbell and Dahna Goldstein for being brave enough to bring part of Scope
Creep The Band into reality!
Here is a portion of my ignite session in a pre-recorded format:
Head in the Clouds: Real world experiences and recommendations for moving technology infrastructure to the cloud.
Whether you’re working with a provider or building your own, moving to the cloud is an important step that takes planning, staff and dollars. This panel discussion looks at the whys and hows of moving to the cloud, as well as how two organizations approached their moves to the cloud. Session specifics will include strategic planning, cost-benefit analysis, infrastructure planning, migration paths, best practices and more.
- The cloud is not just one thing, need to understand some of the different models out there -- public, private, hybrid. Public are outside your network, often big services such as Amazon AWS, Microsoft Azure. Private cloud is a function provided within your own firewall. Something you manage and control. Hybrid - moving to the cloud isn’t a binary choice. Can combine some services in cloud and others on-site, and integrate them.
- Meeting user expectations are good reasons to consider cloud services: availability / access / mobile
- Cloud combined with virtual desktop can create equal access to all tools across staff & org.
- Cloud contracts are CRITICAL to read! When you migrate off, how do you get your data, in what format and when?
- A few things for smooth cloud move: do homework, build a team, communicate vision, plan, test, distinguish need v want,
Marriage Counseling for IT and Communications: Get Better Results Together
From strategy planning to case studies following implementation, gain insight into how a strong partnership between IT and Communications can create a smarter, more sophisticated approach to your communications. (The Amazing Peter Campbell playing the role of IT)
- Leadership must take a role in breaking down silos between IT & Marketing. Too often org chart & leadership builds tension.
- Create a regular format for Communications and IT staff to meet on an ongoing basis
- focusing on business goals gets everyone pulling in one direction. Take out the personal and advance the mission.
- Make help desk process as easy & fast as possible to make tech friendly to mktg & more
- View tech support as relationship not as service to users
- Tip to have better relationship with IT - don't wait for computer problem to be in touch
Fri, March 14
Disrupting the Nonprofit Sector
If we are going to truly solve the world's toughest social problems and obtain the necessary resources to do it right, we need to examine how the nonprofit sector can evolve to create more innovative and efficient organizations. This involves disrupting the nonprofit sector as we know it today. Drawing from Allyson Kapin and Amy Sample Ward's book Social Change Anytime, Everywhere, topics will range from 'Thinking Like A Start-Up' to exploring 'Reducing Competition and Consolidating Resources.'
- Interesting idea: charge for a service, but refund the money if they show up.
- Striking that most orgs invest less than 3% in #nptech
- Disappointment=reality minus expectations. A key to innovation is realistic expectations & know when to quit
- Grow a culture of "we all succeed together" & "we all fail together." Don't allow all compliments to go to any one staff person, nor all of the blame (including leadership).
- Need to delineate between Fail & Screwing Up. Accountability still needs to exist.
- Be purposeful on how much you experiment. Create innovation budget (not just dollars, but risk tolerance too)
- Using run, grow, transform is a good budgeting framework to distinguish operations from innovation http://shar.es/RZndS
- Saying no to an opportunity, even when money is tied to it, let's you say yes to a better opportunity
- If you want to spur change in your org, but you have no authority, figure out who influences the influencers in your org
- Leadership should be cheerleader of staff ideas, not be the creator of all ideas.
This session is for nonprofit tech professionals who have an interest in network security. Learn about various security options that scale keeping in mind limited time, expertise and budget.
- Security matters b/c "damaged reputation/donor lack of confidence in organization could be catastrophic"
- “you can transfer risk to a vendor…but you can’t transfer responsibility for your data”
- Look for ways to tie your security plans to ongoing strategic & capacity needs.
- Patching is 95% of the battle
- definition based security is on its way out b/c threats are so dynamic, that means heuristics are the new it.
- Ken shared a ton of tools and ideas on setup as well, but it is impossible to show without his presentation. (Here is a link, but not sure it will work)
Requests for Proposals: Making RFPs work for Nonprofits and Vendors
This session is for people who either purchases software and services as well as people who provide such things. RFPs are controversial, with good reason: a poorly written RFP does little to help the buyer or seller forge a successful transaction or engagement. (The Amazing Peter Campbell Presiding). Read the great session notes to see more, bunch of my notes in there.
Sat, March 15 (how did both of my sessions end up on Saturday?)
Balancing Project Management and Business Process for Long Term Success - I Presented
Business Process has invaded my career, my life and now my dreams. I will be sharing my experiences plus a lot of thoughts on Methodology, plus Betsy will bring her PMO skills to the table. I don't think I have ever seen a session like this one at NTC, it will rock.
Read the good session notes for this one too! To get an example of part of my session, you can take 10 minutes and watch the video below or check out the slides. NOTE though, the video misses our main point of the session, which was how to make Project Management and Business Process a part of your everyday work, not just during projects.
View the slides!
Tech Planning Smack Down! Tactical Vs. Strategic Vs. Missional - I Presented
THIS WAS FUN! I haven't presented with Lindsay in YEARS, but we make an awesome and fun team, this will not be boring or a slideshow! This will get you thinking and involved. Seriously though, you will learn all new ways to approach your boring, old tech plan.
View the slides.
Read the session notes, but they can not accurately describe the amount of fun we had in this session. Nor can they accurately describe the type of thinking we encouraged in the audience.
SUMMARY

Monday, January 27, 2014
City of Chicago inspires my thinking around Tech
They have Five Strategies (paraphrased below from my notes):
- Next generation Infrastructure
- Every Community a Smart Community
- Efficient, Effective and Open Government
- Civic Innovation
- Technology Sector Growth
Brenna spent a chunk of the time talking about making every community a smart community. Smart communities is an effort already in progress with a few Chicago communities but will be rolled out to more. The initiatives are:
- Broadband access benchmark
- Scale up smart communities
- Free public WiFi
- More low cost broadband
- Youth tech education
- Digital training
- Digital excellence activities
- Public computer access
- Education resources
This struck a topic I love! IT Alignment. There is an understanding of the need to balance the people, process and tools in these initiatives. Making change in Chicago is an enormous task with the politics, diverse communities, unions, corruption, etc... The conversation at the event fascinated me to no end, I was surrounded by smart people with real questions, possible solutions and a desire to collaborate to have an impact.
What I really latched on to was the balance of infrastructure and policy with community needs and people. They understood the "build it and they will come" won't work. Providing infrastructure, computer labs, wifi and Broadband isn't enough, they need outreach, training and creative ways to get the tech into people's homes in ways they will actually use it.
I have just started to become aware of amazing technology innovation in Chicago through efforts of 1871 to provide space for startups, Starter League helping startups succeed, Chicago Maker lab offering 3d printing, Chicago Tech Academy build tech skills in our youth and i.c. stars focused on technology workforce development opportunities (actually I have know i.c. stars for a few years, they rock). Those are just a few, I know there are many more I am missing.
Or visit this set of deeper resources, including a video about the plan
Just my ramblings, sorry if this doesn't have a single point to it, just a collection of notes and thoughts I wanted to share.
Monday, March 4, 2013
Technology Strategy Follow up to #MMM Episode 2
I showed the basic steps of:
- Listing your technology needs, projects and hopes in a spreadsheet
- Add columns for Effort, Priority and Cost
- Fill in columns with high, medium and low
- Then look for the combination of effort, priority and cost that you are able to accomplish
Remember That Technology Is Not a Strategy
According to Allen Gunn, executive director of Aspiration, a San Francisco-based nonprofit technology consulting organization, many organizations make the error of treating technology as a replacement for strategy: “In the same way they’d order up pizza delivery, some nonprofits think they can order up a piping hot enterprise technology strategy. We tell organizations to take a step back and think about your business processes first. Look at things from a process-centric way and not a tech-centric way.”
Be sure to go read the full article, it is fantastic.
Monday, February 18, 2013
Tech Priorities sabotage strategy.
"Our website needs a redesign immediately."
"Our network is down."
Typically followed by:
"In the best interest of the org we need to make this a priority and focus only on it."
All of these projects would need to be made top priority and would require the highest attention. I am not denying the simple fact that IT is often required to focus on a single project or drop everything to fix something.
But as I think through my experiences and so many stories that I have heard, I hear a common theme. "The project we were working on was so critical to one team or goal...... but somehow we missed how it would impact the full org or other goals."
Software is a classic example of this.
- How many times have we heard about a single department or program area running out to get software to meet their needs without first checking with IT to see if it was the right choice?
- This meets the immediate needs and may be the best solution. But a good discussion of how the data will be created, stored, used and shared is critical.
- Or how many times have we changed software packages only to realize that it was our process that was broken not the software and our old software actually did have the functionality we needed?
- Often we blame technology for our ineffective processes
Websites carry the same issue.
- We spend time defining the audience, the design, the functionality, the goals we hope to accomplish and are very deliberate about everything. But then once the website is implemented we suddenly realize that it isn't integrated with our core database, we have created manual work-arounds to collect email signups from the website or includes tools that overlap existing ones used internally?
- We don't always take time to understand the tools used to build our website or to explore other options.
- We often also forget to think through what we will do with the data, analytics and transactions that happen on our website and what the follow up process will need to be.
- How does what happens on our website impact our work and what will we have to do as a result?
Often we do everything we are supposed to within a project to ensure it's success! But without a dedicated resource that reviews all tech projects as a whole, you will miss opportunities to evaluate the impact on the overall org.
Every nonprofit should have a resource, whether internal or external, helping them develop a technology strategy that can be used as a decision framework for technology projects.
Don't let the immediacy of a need or the lack of resources dictate your technology strategy. You will pay for it in the short and long run.
Monday, January 28, 2013
Technology Impact #MMM Episode 1
One Minute Movie on the last Monday of the Month. #MMM. Yeah. I think I can do that!
Then once I have a few similar ones, then maybe I can compile into a blockbuster.
Anyway. The first episode of #MMM = Monday Minute Movie Episode 1 is Technology Impact.
Then to learn more about the IT Alignment model referenced in the video visit my new IT Alignment page.
Tuesday, September 6, 2011
Silo Situation- Life gets in the Way part 6
It reads like a preview for a Hollywood script written by John Grisham starring John Cusak. It all seemed simple enough, the organization had the right hopes, the right mission and the right people but somewhere along the way they "...allowed their culture to dictate their obsolescence." This is the story of the one man who witnessed the whole bizarre series of events....
I have worked in a couple organizations where this Silo Situation was rampant. Each department, each team was so self sufficient that you would have no idea they were all one organization. But they were each successful and funding was flowing. So why question success? Why question what is working?
The silos were created because a grant was funding the program, so the team worked in an isolated group. Or this was a pilot program and needed to be secluded in case it didnt work. Or staff performance is only reviewed based on individual and department success. Or culture encouraged hoarding of information to gain power. Or leadership played favorites and kept secrets. There are so many reasons silos start.
We rest on our current and past success which clouds our ability to see the "silo situation." At the organizations I worked at you could always hear whispers about how bad the silos were. But no one was willing to speak up, because those that did had faded off into the sunset. Suddenly though a big change happened, a funding problem, a crisis, change in leadership or whatever. Then one day we are all wearing buttons that say "silo busters." The org is buzzing with rhetoric and focus groups to destroy the silos. But don't we store all of our grain in silos? (sorry couldn't resist the random comment, just seeing if you are still reading)
When will we learn that collaboration is not new and is not a buzz word? Please don't let life get in the way of finding the silos in your org.
And oh yeah, go read Peter Campbell's AWESOME post! (this time I will remember the link... sorry Peter)
Monday, August 29, 2011
Keys to the Kingdom- Life gets in the Way part 5
We all like to spend a lot of time on the corner of not us and maybe tomorrow. We all want to think that our whole team will be around forever and we can trust everyone. But things happen, relationships sour, people have flaws, etc. We can all look at our past and remember the one time someone close to you did the one thing you never thought they would.
So before life gets in the way, get your IT staff person off of their island. Don't let them be the only ones that know information that can make or break your org.
Peter Campbell always has great advice about "all things IT" and this is no exception. He has a great post all what he calls the "Keys to the Kingdom." These keys are things like the network admin password, software licenses and other documentation. Often we only have one person that understands these things and we allow them to be a single point of failure. We cannot allow a single person to have that responsibility.
Peter talks about the following in his post:
- Follow procedures: get some basic procedures in place and allow time to follow them.
- Involve all stakeholders: Don’t assume that your It staff – who are already struggling to juggle the big projects with user support—are keeping good records. Audit them, assist them and back them up. Finance can take a role in tracking license keys along with purchase records.
- Foster a culture that allows technology staff to succeed
- Have realistic expectations for IT.
- Participate.
- Be appreciative.
- Don’t hire extremes.
Friday, June 17, 2011
Mission Critical or Impact? - Life Gets in the Way part 3-a
In the last post I talked about the role technology can play in meeting your mission. Since I posted it though I can't stop thinking about mission critical technology versus mission impact technology.
For years we have talked about the importance of planning for disaster recovery and business continuity on your mission critical systems. My definition of mission critical is a technology that dramatically impacts your ability to meet your mission. But I think the key to that phrase is "your ability". A mission critical technology changes the way you work or improves a process in such a way that it helps you meet your mission.
But when I talk about technology helping you meet your mission, I want to focus on mission impact technology. Meaning that you implement technology in such a way that it directly meets your mission, not just improves a process or assist you, it actually makes touches those you serve.
I think the distinction between a technology being mission critical and having mission impact is an important one.
An example within the YMCA is our membership databases could be considered mission critical. But our use of tools like ActivTrax to plan workouts, track nutrition and provide guidance directly impacts our members goals and our mission of healthy lifestyles.
Another example could be our website and email blasts as mission critical. But if we were to adapt those tools or social media to connect our members together in order for them to support and encourage each other on their fitness goals, it gets closer to mission impact.
It is not always clear cut, some technology can be both but only when used correctly.
There are other examples, what are yours?
Saturday, May 21, 2011
Life gets in the way.
We tend to complicate our decisions out of fear of the unknown, fear of failure or fear of change. But I would actually challenge that statement, is that really true or are we all just nodding our head because we all say those things so much.
Anyway, I am only two paragraphs into this post and I have already lost my focus. Isn't that really what the problem is for so many of us? We sit down to think strategically, look at the big picture and dream, but we end up getting buried in the stuff that is happening now, doubt creeps in, we question the possibility of success and we get distracted.
It is hard to separate yourself from today and your worries to think about five years from now.
I have found that the best way for me to get past those road blocks is to step back into the past or to shift the focus back to the basics. History teaches us about who we are and the basics remind of us of what is really important.
For years now I have written this blog, but I have never been able to keep it going consistently, life just gets in the way. And that is exactly what happens at work too. I always mean to go write that integrated communications plan, create a vision statement for our website, build a storytelling culture, etc, but life gets in the way.
Over the next couple posts I am going to explore some of my favorite old posts from NPTech Rockstars that may help all of us to take a minute and reflect. (Special thanks to John Kenyon for the inspiration for this, he just reposted his Ten Nonprofit Technology "Commandments" which made me think about this).
My "back to the basics" list:
Ten Nonprofit Technology "Commandments" by John Kenyon
Forget the Tech, Lets Talk Mission by John Merritt
IT Alignment History by Steve Heye (I know self promoting, but I said review YOUR history)
Keys to the Kingdom by Peter Campbell
The Silo Situation by Peter Campbell (WHAT@#%$@ Peter gets 2? He is just so smart.... John Merritt would get 2, but he just doesn't blog enough)
How to Become a Technology Change Leader in Four Easy Steps by Dahna Goldstein
Monday, January 31, 2011
2011 NTC Preview: 6 Steps to Refocus Your Small Org Tech Strategy
6 Steps to Refocus Your Small Org Tech Strategy
Monday, July 19, 2010
NTEN Tech Leadership Academy and what I learned already.
Incredible training op from NTEN - Technology Leadership Academy! This is a free training for smaller orgs, but it is so much more than just a training. They have assembled some of the best trainers, well plus me, to cover the spectrum of technology topics.
Apply before July 30 right here! http://www.nten.org/techacademy
Part of what they will be covering in the Academy above is a great diagram that is in a slideshow from the awesome Holly Ross . The slide shows an adapted, simplified version of the IT Alignment stages that I refer to a lot. But they have added some arrows indicating that as alignment increases the technology brings additional service to the mission. I like the simplicity of it.
But then she also a second diagram (but it looks like she is borrowing it from Save the Children) of a IT Strategy pyramid that talks about how to progress forward in these IT Alignment stages. This diagram helps illustrate that only one of the levels is solely focused on tech tools, the foundation.
The second level requires examining your operations and tech. The third level is not just business steps, it is how you deliver your programs, serve your constituents, meet your mission with tech.
The top of the triangle is all about what you do differently, this requires not just thinking about how you deliver services, but how you can leverage technology to completely change your whole organization, add a new service or completely redefine the way you meet your mission leveraging technology.
To see the full presentation that Holly created you can visit SlideShare at: http://www.slideshare.net/nten_hross/let-a-thousand-tech-flowers-bloom
Thanks for inviting me to participate Holly, looking forward to it!
Wednesday, June 23, 2010
IT Manifesto and Collection of things...
"Right now, in our sector, we need technology leaders. We are standing right on top of a critical inflection point, and we owe it to our causes to make sure that we navigate the change as best as we possibly can. So I am calling on all of you to stand up and lead. We will follow you."
"The old style of IT management was a command-and-control model. It was about "experts" making decisions for the end users and mandating those decisions. These days, there are more experts than you think. innovation and expertise in technology can come from any staffer in any role, and technology leaders need to recognize and embrace that. We need to run IT shops that protect our assets while encouraging this innovation. When everyone's a part of process, the revolution happens much more quickly."
And from out of the comments from Holly:
"tech is definitely undefined and muddy now. It's out of the back room and out in every department at your organization. Think about how we used to deal with IT...." "now technology is a completely different beast. It's about communicating, conversing, collecting, sharing, advocating and more. It's about all the ways that we meet your missions."
Holly hints that the conversation about technology leaders has only just begun for the next year. I cant wait to see what comes out of this.
And here are a few other gems I want to share:
Recording of a presentation on IT Alignment that John Merritt and I did for NTEN. It is worth a watch, we were on something of a roll that day.
Slideshow of Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom from Holly Ross.
Forget the Tech, Lets Talk Mission - Great article from John Merritt (he wrote it and just added my name)
And now for something completely different, be sure to take time to order your copy of Beth Kanter and Allison Fine's new book the Networked Nonprofit. Read more about the book and the launch!
Flickr Photo credit: Chris.Corwin
Thursday, May 20, 2010
Software randomly creates policy where none exists & other stuff I learned
Ok, so in many cases following the rules and policies dictated by your software is a good thing. Many times these are based on regulations, business practices and audit standards. But beyond that should you determine the most effective way to run your organization, then try to adapt those practices to your software. Rather than seeing how the software works, then letting that dictate your process?
Slow down Steve, where is all of this craziness coming from?
I was excited to be given the chance to present my #10ntc Ignite session for a small group over at the Great Book Foundation. My ignite session tries to relay a point about how technology staff talking about tools and solutions can kill your audience. After that I spend about 20 minutes talking all about IT Alignment stuff from the NTEN book. Then we opened it up for some questions and answers.
There was a group of questions that revolved around determining policy, planning technology strategy and staff roles in all of this. That is when someone asked about how do you manage a multi-layer technology strategy that meets the needs of the individual staff, each department and the full organization. If you are meeting all of those needs wouldnt that require multiple technology strategies and require those strategies to start from very different perspectives?
That lead me to try to explain how you do need to have a few parts to your IT Alignment strategy. This goes back to John Merritt's idea of the ART of the Technology. ART = Alignment, Relationship, Transparency. First, have a strategy to make the technology work so well that it is transparent, second work to build relationships between IT and the rest of the org, third move technology to meeting the mission through Alignment. So yes, it is a bunch of strategies, not just one focused on mission, but that is still the end goal.
Steve, you are so off track yet again, wasnt this post about software creating policy? Yes, it is about that and I am trying to get back to that if you would just let me.
This then loops us back to the comment about software creating policies and practices where there are none. If you dont have a well rounded technology strategy that is focusing on all three elements Alignment, Relationship and Transparency tied to the mission it is easy to let the tools take over.
WOW! Did you see how I just tied that all together and referenced the ignite session as well? ZOINKS!
Monday, May 10, 2010
Stop selling Slurpees and Lead with questions

But I would argue that this solution pushing turns us into a convenience store. We are only asked about things when a solution is needed. Why do we need to be part of the planning when all we do is provide the solution? People would rather finish their planning, identify what the problem or need is, then step up to the Slurpee counter and order the quick fix.
By acting under the orders of "the customer is always right" and "Service with a smile", are we really providing the best services to our organization?
Most of the Nonprofit Tech Staff that I know have much deeper skills than providing icee beverages when people need a quick fix. We have a set of skills that complements the rest of organization very well but I dont see it used enough. We are very analytical, process oriented, mission driven and creative with a unique perspective, plus the knowledge of tools and methods that many others dont know. So why do we squander it?
Here is my proposal. When a request comes in, lead with a "Yes but I have some questions..." Spend some time asking questions about what they are working on, what is the end goal, what would success look like. And dont ask these questions in a formal document or a survey, try talking to your colleagues.

In general, I think we all need to start leading with questions, not answers. Try to listen and not jump to the solution.
Thursday, September 24, 2009
IT is not your friend and you are not our customer! =IT planning? (Part 4 of 11 on Managing Tech 2 Meet Mission)

Whoa, slow down Steve, what does that have to do with the IT Planning and Prioritizing chapter by the brainiac Peter S. Campbell in the NTEN book, Managing Technology to Meet your Mission? Well, if you would be more patient, I will get there. I was trying to think what I could add to Peter’s chapter without just repeating his totally accurate and well thought out methodology. Because I cant compete with his knowledge on this topic.
However, I think an element that should be stressed when Peter talks about building that integrated plan that includes technology, is understanding how IT is seen by the org. We can write the best plans, set goals, define metrics and have all the best intentions, but if IT doesn’t have the relationships it needs they wont be acted on.
If you think of the staff in your organization as customers, then your ultimate goal would be to meet their needs working with the motto that the customer is right. In this approach you react to the requests and needs of your customers. Your role is to provide the solution, support or training that they tell you they need.
If you strive to have the friendliest, well liked relationship with the staff, then all you do is strive to make them happy. But sometimes we have to push back on some ideas in order to balance the needs of the full organization. We simply cannot make everyone happy all the time and be their BFF.
We have to act as a partner, we are all working toward the same mission. The relationship between IT can be a friendly one, but our allegiance should lie with the mission and strategic plan. As a partner we work with the other departments, not for them as customer implies.
So tying this all back to Peters “spot on” description about IT priorities and planning. Our ability to participate in the planning process and get invited to the table with access to provide input depends on the role we play. If we are simply taking orders, then the IT priorities will be subject to whimsical changes. If we are there to be their friends, will they heed our advice and expertise?
After saying all of that though, you would be mistaken in not reading Peter’s chapter and implementing the process he recommends. You may just want to be sure you keep the whole picture in mind and read the rest of the book too. The best laid plans….
Flickr photos by kalandrakas and by Claudio Cicali and by LollyKnit
Thursday, August 6, 2009
Aligning Tech with Mission (Part 1 of 11 on Managing Tech 2 Meet Mission)
Meeting the mission is why we are here right? Then why not let everyone within your organization work toward meeting the mission, rather than just making things work?
That may be over simplifying things, but hey I am writing this blog post so if you don’t like it write your own or leave a comment.
Over the next 11 weeks I am doing a themed series of blog posts. Each week I will write about a chapter of the book called Managing Technology to meet your Mission. This week is on the 1st chapter about IT alignment (which I was the ring leader for). But rather than rehash what is in the chapter, I am adding a few things to it that compliment it very well. I want to talk about the role of the CEO and technology strategy. NTEN is also running an AWESOME 2 day online conference!
Lets start with Technology Strategy and how it gets created at a YMCA (you can adapt this to your org if you aren’t a YMCA). But rather than bore you with more words, flip through this presentation.
Key Thought:
Is your IT department there to just fill orders or is it a part of your mission team?
But this is not a new thought, much of my thinking around this topic is summed up in this diagram that dates back to 1993.
Here is the quoted text that explains it (click here for full text):
Venkatraman ea argue in 1993 that the difficulty to realize value from IT investments is firstly due to the lack of alignment between the business and IT strategy of the organizations that are making investments, and secondly due to the lack of a dynamic administrative process to ensure continuous alignment between the business and IT domains.
They describe Four Dominant Alignment Perspectives towards the analytic alignment of Business and IT:
-
Strategy Execution: this perspective views the business strategy as the driver of both organization design choices and the logic of IS infrastructure (the classic, hierarchical view of strategic management). Top Management is strategy formulator, IS Management is strategy implementer. [Arrow 1]
-
Technology Potential: this perspective also views the business strategy as the driver, however involves the articulation of an IT strategy to support the chosen business strategy and the corresponding specification of the required IS infrastructure and processes. The top management should provide the technology vision to articulate the logic and choices pertaining to IT strategy that would best support the chosen business strategy, while the role of the IS manager should be that of the technology architect - who efficiently and effectively designs and implements the required IS infrastructure that is consistent with the external component of IT strategy (scope, competences and governance). [Arrow 2]
-
Competitive Potential: this alignment perspective is concerned with the exploitation of emerging IT capabilities to impact new products and services (i.e., business scope), influence the key attributes of strategy (distinctive competences), as well as develop new forms of relationships (i.e. business governance). Unlike the two previous perspectives that considered business strategy as given (or a constraint for organizational transformation), this perspective allows the modification of business strategy via emerging IT capabilities. The specific role of the top management to make this perspective succeed is that of the business visionary, who articulates how the emerging IT competences and functionality as well as changing governance patterns in the IT marketplace would impact the business strategy. The role of the IS manager, in contrast, is one of the catalyst, who identifies and interprets the trends in the IT environment to assist the business managers to understand the potential opportunities and threats from an IT perspective. [Arrow 3]
-
Service Level: This alignment perspective focuses on how to build world class IT/IS organization within an organization. In this perspective, the role of business strategy is indirect. This perspective is often viewed as necessary (but not sufficient) to ensure the effective use of IT resources and be responsive to the growing and fast-changing demands of the end-user population. The specific role of the top management to make this perspective succeed is that of the prioritizer, who articulates how best to allocate the scarce resources both within the organization as well as in the IT marketplace (in terms of joint ventures, licensing, minority equity investments, etc.). The role of the IS manager, in contrast, is one of business leadership, with the specific tasks of making the internai business succeed within the operating guidelines from the top management. [Arrow 4]
The idea is to think through where a technology strategy or project starts to how it is implemented. Does it start with a tool, then you look how to leverage it? Does it start with a business or technology need? Or is it tied to the overall strategy? I think each of these has there place, there are times where technology should drive the strategy or where technology should be asked to solve a single problem. BUT that should be balanced by allowing technology to participate in the mission strategy as well.
I blame the CEO. Oops did I say that outloud? If technology is not integrated into your mission and mission team, I blame the CEO. The CEO does not have to be involved in, completely understand or even totally support technology. But the CEO is ultimately responsible for three things: appointing correct IT leadership, giving needed authority to IT staff and providing a reasonable budget. Notice I didn’t say they have to love technology, nor do they need to have cutting edge tools or whatever…
Before I continue my rampage, watch this slideshow about the role of CEO and CIO. This slideshow was the end result of years of work of the IT Director and CEO building a relationship.
I hope the positive approach in that slideshow was better than my short attack paragraph on CEOs, which really wasn’t meant as an attack at all. I have met many CEOs that I like.
The point here is that the IT department can do everything in their power to help meet the mission but until they are aligned within the organization it wont be as effective.
If you enjoyed this, good, because there are 10 more posts coming about the remaining chapters in the book called Managing Technology to meet your Mission. NTEN is also running an AWESOME 2 day online conference! Sign up today.
Thursday, July 23, 2009
Zoo or Jungle? what is your IT alignment?

When you go to the Zoo each of the animals has their area to live in. The zookeepers do everything they can to replicate the animals natural environment, diet and activity in their cages. They provide the best care that they can to keep the animal healthy and happy. The zoo keeper is focused on one exhibit or area at a time. However very few, if any, of the actions that the Zoo Keepers make for each animal actually help the full zoo. You treat each of the animal areas as individual projects.
"...one thing stands out. We have moved from projects that benefit the entire org, to department-based work. That’s not to say that Finance or Marketing don’t have valid technology needs, not at all. But this segregation of projects is troubling."
Friday, May 1, 2009
People are more important than tools - #09NTC wrap up
- Technology doesnt just allow you to do the same thing faster, it allows you to rethink how you do everything.
- Use of social tools & application is more important than the design. so dont ask how to use socnet, ask why & what do you want 2 happen?
- Lets make knowledge something we share, not something that someone else owns.
- Future is free software, free hardware and free bandwidth
- "You can't stop people from thinking, you can only stop them from sharing"
- Profit is not evil, but it is easy to do evil when your eye is on profit. Money isn't the problem, it's the love of money. Greed gets in the way.
- Its not about intellectual property, it should be free speech
- People read about 25% slower on the internet than on paper, so need less words
- Things to test, headline, header image, gift strings, copy under headline and form layout.
- Does your copy explain you mission, list how money will be used, is it tax deductible?
- Are you asking for useless information on your donor form? like surname? middle initial, daytime number, suffix? I mean really are you going to use it?
- Multivariate is testing multiple variables (page elements) on a landing page at the same time? How well do the elements work together?
- Amnesty example talks about spending soo much of there times with interactive tools and widgets but they missed the point that people were getting lost at the landing pages because of content and layout. Traffic is only good if it stays and converts which was getting lost on widget focus.
- Outline key objectives of site and establish baseline
- Understand what to track - know what direction to go
- Understand cross channel performance
- Continually monitor trends
- You need to think through how to keep online donors, they are easy to loose and may have a tendency to not return. How will you engage and retain them?
- Trends are more important than snapshots of activity
- Target and communicate more with those that are most active. And downgrade those that are less active.
- What is it that measures success for you on the web? What is your key outcome?
- How do you find out who is already talking about you on a social space or a blog? and are they worth trying to recruit to speak on your behalf? and are they able to help? Google search with technorati can find top blogs using key words. www.issuecrawler.net is a good resource to find blogs on similar topc/interest.
- Find methods to get people to talk about you, dont push messages, build relationships and arm your supporters with tools.
- One of the greatest predictor in a fundraising event is your campaigners getting that first gift.
Unleashing the Ultimate Cool Factor: Case Studies of Conferences Energized Through Social Media - big panel with Maddie Grant
- Talking about an event and building the hype should be a year round activity.
- Build a community around the purpose of the event
- Rally to build knowledge and sharing even before you get together in person
- dont do anything in social media unless you have a goal and you can measure it
- build your online coummincation for your audience, not what your staff or board wants.
- Create a calendar of communication plan, but think message not tool (who will write, what, when) then match tool 2 audience
- Content, cultivation, credibility and clickability - 4 Cs of a
- Volume of email subscriptions is not useful if they dont really want to hear from you.
- Hilarious="if sister margaret can maintain a website at 87 and learn HTML at 74, then you can too."
- Email should be personal, targeted, integrated with web/direct mail, trackable
- good content=1. highlight keywords 2. use bullet list 3. one idea per pargph 4. cut txt in half twice 5. use links
- Help your supporters take the Lead – The frozen pea fund was a very successful fundraising campaign that was hatched by a Cancer survivor. She needed an ice pack in recovery, but didn’t have one, so she used frozen peas. Then decided to post that and share it and the concept caught on to a group. Then ACS heard about it, contacted them to provided support and tools.
- ACS decided not to use YouTube because of possible negative & stupid comments, like "dude, that video sucked"
- Everyone should be thinking about some sort of mobile giving campaign, use of mobile tech is exploding
- google analytics, summize.com, compete.com, tweetscan.com, google blog alerts beta, viewzi.com facebook, good search tools to monitor conversations
- ACS gave access to secret special videos if someone raises enough money for their org